With complete respect to all who are posting here, I was looking through my old vinyl single collection and found my Endlessly limited edition picture disc and re-released version's limited edition gatefold sleeve. They both sounded exactly the same as the regular versions save for some depth of sound deterioration on the picture disc (bad vinyl?). I was then confused by what "limited edition" actually meant, as I was never under the impression that the goods I bought would be the only opportunity to buy the music in question.
It is an interesting conundrum with many view points - I hope it continues to get discussed here constructively.
My lead on from this is that I wonder if Mr Foxx has found artistic flaws in the earlier material that he thinks needed fixing. This kind of thing fascinates me, as I always wonder how artists decide something is ready for release (and more obscurely, I wonder if Leonardo would "adjust" the Mona Lisa if he had the opoprtunity to do so today). I'm personally glad that an artist I like is still revisiting music and offering different perspectives, even if they are only slight changes in some cases. I'm in control as to whether I buy or not, and if it exposes the work to a wider audience, then that has to be a good thing. With the recent events that John Foxx has done (last 12 months at least), from Quiet Man to DNA it isn't unreasonable to assume that there may be quite a reasonable surge in interest in his work, that is worth reissuing some work.
I don't believe that this will water down any intrinsic value of original versions - they are what they are, and subsequent copies will only ever be such.