Originally posted by MikeG:
Should we be expecting an 'official' response to the questions raised in this thread?
yeah ... i really hope so , as it would sicken me beyond belief to even dare to think that when i bought the new version of "metamatic" , which was CLEARLY ADVERTISED as a REMASTER , it's actually not a remaster , so i demand an "official" answer to the ONLY interesting question in this case for me again now :
is the new version of "metamatic" a remaster or not ?
YES or NO ?
i'm awaiting THE DEFINITE ANSWER to it now !
[ ... ]
btw : to all those people , who supported or even thanked this scott troll here , i can only say that i'm indeed deeply saddened to see this happening @ all , but as such a behaviour is not new to me & some people seem to "enjoy" such a role as "the devil's advocate" i can only tell u - & u know , who i mean with it ! - that i do NOT wish to talk or discuss ANYTHING with u again , if u aren't even able to differentiate between a person's private opinion & THE FACTS ! :-/
as i already wrote here before : either it's indeed a remaster , then this scott troll is jus' a vicious LIAR ... or it is not , then rob harris has lied to us , as he claimed that it's a remaster , as he was asked about it - plain & simple FACT !
fyi : there is NO room for other "interpretations" in this case , as painful as it may be in the end ! *sigh*
to make this clear without a doubt : i still trust the given word of rob harris & not the word of "somebody" , who only came here , because i've challenged him to prove his claims !
that much is for sure - anyway !
however ... i still want to know THE DEFINITIVE ANSWER to my original question !