Metamatic : The Official John Foxx Website...
NEWS DISCOGRAPHY MERCHANDISE ARCHIVE INDEX FORUM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 10 of 11 1 2 8 9 10 11
Joined: Dec 2006
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Quote:
Originally posted by Steve Roby:
For that matter, I remember being absolutely horrified when I finally heard "Brother and Sister" by Midge Ure and Kate Bush. I thought Midge was just fine as a singer, and I've loved Kate Bush for thirty years or so now, but I'll be damned if that isn't utterly unlistenable.
With this track it isnt their voices, which are both fine, but the actual song itself. Maybe it is the silly lyrics. Definitely not my favorite track though.

Joined: Apr 2008
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Quote:
Originally posted by maryann:
I do not believe any John Foxx (or Gary Numan for that matter) cd should have any female backing vocals at all.
Quote:
Originally posted by core memory:
I feel it goes against the grain of the landscape they’ve mapped out on so much of their work. If the female voice is there as a texture that’s one thing, but if any other voice is there just as a backing singer then I start to question what I’m hearing as that voice sometimes starts to feel out of place . . .
I wouldn't say I'm completely opposed to backing vocals if they provide sufficient counterpoint. As Steve Roby accurately pointed out in this thread, John Foxx's own background vocals on some of TGS were at least as problematic as Eddi Reader's on IMW. Unless it’s a shoop-shoop call-and-response type of Motown pop chorus or well-blended harmonies, throwing another voice in – whether female or male – just to fill space rarely adds anything but an annoying distraction. Sorry, but I'm afraid that often applies to Louis's voice, too!
Quote:
Originally posted by core memory:
I don’t think there’s anything esoteric about her voice at all on the song, she’s strong and enthusiastic but it’s all too ordinary for me within the context of a Foxx work, I guess maybe Liz Fraser didn’t answer John ‘s phone call at the time
Frankly, I don’t think Liz Fraser’s high sweep and airy gloss would have provided an interesting enough counterpoint to John Foxx’s vocals either. If he must have someone sing with him I think he would benefit from someone with a more languid, less urgent voice than his own, and maybe a deeper, huskier range than his, too – there needs to be a good contrast to make it work. Otherwise, why not just stick with the synthesizer?

Joined: Jul 2008
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally posted by Lele:
Quote:
Originally posted by core memory:
I feel it goes against the grain of the landscape they’ve mapped out on so much of their work
I wouldn't say I'm completely opposed to backing vocals if they provide sufficient counterpoint...
...there needs to be a good contrast to make it work
On giving this more thought, I could be persuaded to do a 360 on this subject.
I think the sole reason I’m opposed to backing vocal’s male or female is down to the fact that the additional voices John has used just do not feel inspiring enough for me, and have stuck out rather than fuse with or enhance the work, but I think you are right in suggesting that John would benefit more from having a counterpoint to him.
Enter the Angel is a track I do like on original IMW, but it’s Eddi's presence on it that prevents me from loving it as much as I’d like to. There is too much of her actually singing along with lines like: “What’s your name…” I don’t mind her going “Ah ah ah…” or “Wah, Haaaaa…” it just adds a texture, however her repeated “Enter, enter the Angel” is more than I need to hear.

John tends to do this sort of thing in gig’s with certain songs: “I remember your face”, “I remember your face” times 10 at the end of Plaza, and of course the "Shifting City Endless-vocally climatic-technicolour festival-extravaganza bonanza bonanza" eek

The use of a female vocal on Enter the Angel still leaves me feeling undecided if Eddi is there as the actual presence of the Angel itself, or if the dual male and female voices of John and her are representing the androgyny and completeness of an Angelic messenger.

Quote:
Originally posted by Lele:
...a shoop-shoop call-and-response type of Motown pop chorus...
Hmm… ‘Young Man’ has great music, I love the choral part with John towards the end, but maybe he was again just ‘too happy’ here, as one tiny part makes me cringe slightly… eek


Quote:
Originally posted by Lele
(re: IMW):
it’s still kind of amazing to me that it didn’t catch on bigger, because it wasn’t any worse than a lot of stuff that was popular. However, as I didn’t enjoy "Miami Vice" and John Hughes's teen films back then, I don’t look back on them with affectionate nostalgia now
Quote: “Five high school students, all different stereotypes, meet in detention, where they pour their hearts out to each other, and discover how they have a lot more in common than they thought”

Aw, don’t you think that ‘Lose all sense of time’ would have fitted very well in Hughes 'Breakfast Club' in the long scenes of the growing bond between the princess, jock, criminal, brain, and basket case laugh

Quote:
Originally posted by Lele:
I think I understand what motivated him to record it and perhaps why he made some of the choices he made in the recording of it
Great review, it’s very fair, and represents very well one side of the divide in the differing perspectives of opinion in the IMW debate.

Quote:
Originally posted by Birdsong:
Be warned - I am an even bigger fan of IMW now than I was before. laugh cool
...both artist and label threw their arms in the air and said "F*ck it then - do what you like!".
The result was In Mysterious Ways. wink
I’m still pondering it all…

Joined: Dec 2006
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Out of all the extra tracks across the three bonus discs, I have to say I'm enjoying "To Be With You" and "Magic" the most! eek

Joined: Sep 2007
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Originally Posted by Alex S
Quote:
Out of all the extra tracks across the three bonus discs, I have to say I'm enjoying "To Be With You" and "Magic" the most!
You're not suggesting that I should actually go out and buy the album are you? laugh

Joined: Jul 2008
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally posted by Alex S:
Actually I just realised that John's vocal on "Magic" is quite Peter Gabriel-esque! cool

These three tracks certainly didn't fit in with the rest of the album - maybe this was the kind of direction John's music almost headed off into...
I think I hear what you say there also, and reflecting on Peter’s album of ’86 I started thinking what if John had brought out an album in ’87? with producer Daniel Lanois at the helm, bringing his delicate ambient touch to a follow-up to (whatever was in essence good about) IMW…

Joined: Dec 2006
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Quote:
Originally posted by Alex S:
Out of all the extra tracks across the three bonus discs, I have to say I'm enjoying "To Be With You"
That was an unexpected 'new' classic for me too.

Joined: Dec 2006
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Quote:
Originally posted by newvox:
Quote:
Originally posted by Alex S:
[b] Out of all the extra tracks across the three bonus discs, I have to say I'm enjoying "To Be With You"
That was an unexpected 'new' classic for me too. [/b]
The version on the Metamatic bonus cd is a new favorite of mine.

Joined: Dec 2006
H
Member
Offline
Member
H
Joined: Dec 2006
A belated contribution from me, as one who has always felt much of IMW is remarkably underrated compared to John's other work.

I have to say the album itself is lifted massively by the replacement of TSOP by "Spin Away". Yes, it's very derivative of Van Morrison, yes it's only got two chords, but it's got a rush of joy and excitement and a wonderfully enthusiastic vocal that transcends all that and places it as a new entry in my top 10 JF songs. It's also soundtracked my autumnal holidays this year and will, for me, always be associated with a good and happy time.

As for the other bonus tracks, well I'm perhaps less enthusiastic. I half suspect that a more bombastic album had been originally planned along the lines of what the likes of Simple Minds, Then Jerico etc were doing round about that time and it just sounds so wrong to hear John suffering the indignity of having to go down that road. The alternative versions of "Shine On" and "Enter The Angel" just sound so lumpy and plodding that I doubt I'll have recourse to listen to them again.

Most bizarre of all of course is "Magic". Enough has been said about this one already, but am I the only one distracted by the sampled backing vocals at the start that sound like they're signing "Hedgehog! Hedgehog-hedgehog!" ??????

Joined: Dec 2006
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Quote:
Originally posted by Herbert the turbot:
A belated contribution from me, as one who has always felt much of IMW is remarkably underrated compared to John's other work.

I have to say the album itself is lifted massively by the replacement of TSOP by "Spin Away". Yes, it's very derivative of Van Morrison, yes it's only got two chords [...]

[...] Most bizarre of all of course is "Magic". Enough has been said about this one already, but am I the only one distracted by the sampled backing vocals at the start that sound like they're signing "Hedgehog! Hedgehog-hedgehog!" ??????
Less is often more. I like Bob Dylan's quote, something about you can play a song with one chord, or even with one note.

I look forward to listening out for the Magic hedgehogs next time I feel in a Foxxy mood. laugh

Page 10 of 11 1 2 8 9 10 11

Moderated by  Birdsong, Rob Harris 

Link Copied to Clipboard

 Metamatic Website
Copyright © 1998 / 2021 Metamatic. No part of this website may be reproduced in any form, or by any means, without prior permission in writing from Metamatic.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5